Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. State
This text of Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. State (Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2013
NO. 03-10-00715-CR
Nilda Iliana Rodriguez, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN; CONCURRING OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD; DISSENTING OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being
considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment of
conviction: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the trial
court’s judgment of conviction is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is
indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision
be certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nilda-iliana-rodriguez-v-state-texapp-2013.