Nieves v. State
835 So. 2d 1216, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 2003 WL 144074
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nieves v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 833 So. 2d 190 →
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant refiling a legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, [1217]*12171167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(explaining that “[t]he allegations required by [State v.] Mancino [, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998),] at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates an entitlement to relief’).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nieves v. State, 835 So. 2d 1216, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 2003 WL 144074 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
835 So. 2d 1216 (Nieves v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)