Nieves v. State

835 So. 2d 1216, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 2003 WL 144074
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nieves v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 833 So. 2d 190
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 2003·No. No. 4D02-3885·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant refiling a legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, [1217]*12171167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(explaining that “[t]he allegations required by [State v.] Mancino [, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998),] at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates an entitlement to relief’).

GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nieves v. State, 835 So. 2d 1216, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 2003 WL 144074 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

835 So. 2d 1216 (Nieves v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)