Nieves v. State
This text of 835 So. 2d 1216 (Nieves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant refiling a legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, [1217]*12171167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(explaining that “[t]he allegations required by [State v.] Mancino [, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998),] at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates an entitlement to relief’).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
835 So. 2d 1216, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 2003 WL 144074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nieves-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.