Nieves v. State

835 So. 2d 1216, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 2003 WL 144074
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 22, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-3885
StatusPublished

This text of 835 So. 2d 1216 (Nieves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nieves v. State, 835 So. 2d 1216, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 2003 WL 144074 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant refiling a legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167, [1217]*12171167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(explaining that “[t]he allegations required by [State v.] Mancino [, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998),] at a minimum would have to address how and where the record demonstrates an entitlement to relief’).

GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 So. 2d 1216, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 466, 2003 WL 144074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nieves-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.