Nicoll & Davis LLR v. Ainetchi

52 A.D.3d 412, 859 N.Y.S.2d 368
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered April 26, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff law firm’s failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for services provided (see Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P, Gonzalez, Buckley and Catterson, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 30942(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nicoll & Davis LLR v. Ainetchi, 52 A.D.3d 412, 859 N.Y.S.2d 368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

52 A.D.3d 412 (Nicoll & Davis LLR v. Ainetchi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Notrica v. North Hills Holding Co.
105 A.D.3d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Nabi v. Sells
70 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)