Nicoll & Davis LLR v. Ainetchi

52 A.D.3d 412, 859 N.Y.S.2d 368
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 A.D.3d 412 (Nicoll & Davis LLR v. Ainetchi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nicoll & Davis LLR v. Ainetchi, 52 A.D.3d 412, 859 N.Y.S.2d 368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered April 26, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff law firm’s failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for services provided (see Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P, Gonzalez, Buckley and Catterson, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 30942(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Notrica v. North Hills Holding Co.
105 A.D.3d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Nabi v. Sells
70 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.3d 412, 859 N.Y.S.2d 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicoll-davis-llr-v-ainetchi-nyappdiv-2008.