Nickle v. Stewart
111 U.S. 776, 4 S. Ct. 700, 28 L. Ed. 599, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1836
Opinion
delivered the'opinion of the court.
Without intending to decide that an appeal lies to this court from an order óf a circuit court, or of a district court exercising circuit court powers, refusing leave to file a bill of review, we hold that the refusal in this case was right.. The bill as presented has none of the characteristics of a bill of review. No errors of law appearing on the face of the record are assigned, and there is no allegation of any discovery of new matter since the decree was rendered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nickle v. Stewart, 111 U.S. 776, 4 S. Ct. 700, 28 L. Ed. 599, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1836 (1884).
111 U.S. 776 (Nickle v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Klapprott
6 F.R.D. 450 (D. New Jersey, 1947)
Irvin v. Buick Motor Co.
88 F.2d 947 (Eighth Circuit, 1937)
Peeke v. Citizens Banking Co.
81 F.2d 112 (Sixth Circuit, 1935)
Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.
61 F.2d 31 (Eighth Circuit, 1932)
Rudolph v. Hunt
286 F. 1007 (District of Columbia, 1923)
Thomas v. South Butte Mining Co.
230 F. 968 (Ninth Circuit, 1916)
Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Gittings
62 A. 1030 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1906)
Cocke v. Copenhaver
126 F. 145 (Fourth Circuit, 1903)
Camp Mfg. Co. v. Parker
121 F. 195 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina, 1903)
Hendryx v. Perkins
114 F. 801 (First Circuit, 1902)
Halsted v. Forest Hill Co.
109 F. 820 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia, 1901)
Schaefer v. Wunderle
39 N.E. 623 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1895)
Willamette Iron Bridge Co. v. Hatch
125 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1888)