Nickerson v. Loud
This text of 115 Mass. 94 (Nickerson v. Loud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In order to induce a court of chancery to order a writing to be cancelled or surrendered, as constituting a cloud upon title, it must at least be an instrument which upon its face is, or with the aid of extrinsic facts may be, some evidence of a right adverse to the plaintiff’s. The writings which the defendants in this case have caused to be recorded in the registry of deeds are mere assertions, which cannot under any circumstances [98]*98be evidence against the plaintiffs or in favor of the defendants, Such writings, whether recorded or unrecorded, do not constitute a cloud upon title, against which equity will grant relief. Peirsoll v. Elliott, 6 Pet. 95. If they were unlawfully recorded, and to the injury of the plaintiffs, their remedy, if any, is by action at law for damages. Demurrer sustained and bill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 Mass. 94, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nickerson-v-loud-mass-1874.