Leeds v. Wheeler

31 N.E. 709, 157 Mass. 67, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 20
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 24, 1892·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Field, C. J.

The paper recorded in the registry of deeds did not purport to convey to the defendant any interest in the land. It was a claim on his part to an equitable interest, but there is nothing in the statutes which requires or permits such a paper to be recorded in a registry of deeds, and it ought not to have been received and recorded. The finding contained in the report of the case, “ that the defendant had no interest in the land,” appears to be correct. Under our decisions the bill was properly dismissed. Nickerson v. Loud, 115 Mass. 94. First African Methodist Episcopal Society v. Brown, 147 Mass. 296.

Bill dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leeds v. Wheeler, 31 N.E. 709, 157 Mass. 67, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 20 (Mass. 1892).

31 N.E. 709 (Leeds v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Triangle Center, Inc. v. Department of Public Works
438 N.E.2d 798 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1982)
Chee Yit Tung ex rel. Chee Sun v. Achi
26 Haw. 642 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1922)
Gilman v. Gilman
50 N.E. 452 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)