Nickelson Ex Rel. Lohrasbi v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nickelson Ex Rel. Lohrasbi v. Roberts

224 S.W.3d 640, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 797

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 2007·No. ED 88326·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the trial court’s judgment on remand that determined the amount of overpaid child support. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

*641 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the trial court’s judgment on remand that determined the amount of overpaid child support. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

*641 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Nickelson Ex Rel. Lohrasbi v. Roberts, 224 S.W.3d 640, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 797 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

224 S.W.3d 640 (Nickelson Ex Rel. Lohrasbi v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related