Kertz v. Kertz
224 S.W.3d 640, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 790, 2007 WL 1531290
Opinion
ORDER
Husband, Edwin L. Kertz, appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Wife, Jean F. Kertz. Husband challenges the trial court’s valuation and distribution of marital property and debt. We affirm. 1 An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(1).
1
. All pending motions are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kertz v. Kertz, 224 S.W.3d 640, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 790, 2007 WL 1531290 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
224 S.W.3d 640 (Kertz v. Kertz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nickelson Ex Rel. Lohrasbi v. Roberts
224 S.W.3d 640 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)