Nichols v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nichols v. Smith

171 A.D. 890

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D. 890 (Nichols v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols v. Smith, 171 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that the order bringing in the committee of Emma Smith, an incompetent person, and the administratrix of the estate of Loren D. Smith, deceased, as parties plaintiff with Addie L. Nichols individually, was unauthorized, said proposed parties plaintiff not being united in interest in the subject of the action. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented and voted for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that the order bringing in the committee of Emma Smith, an incompetent person, and the administratrix of the estate of Loren D. Smith, deceased, as parties plaintiff with Addie L. Nichols individually, was unauthorized, said proposed parties plaintiff not being united in interest in the subject of the action. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented and voted for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-smith-nyappdiv-1915.