Niagara Environmental Action v. City of Niagara Falls
This text of 468 N.E.2d 694 (Niagara Environmental Action v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs.
It cannot be said on the record before us, in view of the then pending litigation, that the Appellate Division erred, as a matter of law, in holding that respondent had a reasonable basis in law for withholding the requested materials. Accordingly, the denial of petitioner’s request for attorneys’ fees cannot be disturbed by this court.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 N.E.2d 694, 63 N.Y.2d 651, 479 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/niagara-environmental-action-v-city-of-niagara-falls-ny-1984.