Canandaigua Messenger, Inc. v. Wharmby

292 A.D.2d 836, 739 N.Y.S.2d 301
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 2002
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 292 A.D.2d 836 (Canandaigua Messenger, Inc. v. Wharmby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Canandaigua Messenger, Inc. v. Wharmby, 292 A.D.2d 836, 739 N.Y.S.2d 301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Appeal from parts of an amended order and judgment (one document) of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Henry, Jr., J.), entered June 11, 2001, that, inter alia, directed respondents Canandaigua Recreation Development Corporation and Dennis A. Morga to provide petitioner access for inspection and copying of nonexempt documentation.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see, Matter of Kolasz v Levitt, 63 AD2d 777, 779). Present — Green, J.P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Bums, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kolasz v. Levitt
63 A.D.2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 A.D.2d 836, 739 N.Y.S.2d 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canandaigua-messenger-inc-v-wharmby-nyappdiv-2002.