Ngo v. Slaughter

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Mexico
DecidedJanuary 28, 2025
Docket2:23-cv-00056
StatusUnknown

This text of Ngo v. Slaughter (Ngo v. Slaughter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ngo v. Slaughter, (D.N.M. 2025).

Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JIMMY NGO, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:23-cv-0056 SMD/DLM CLAYTON SLAUGHTER, and J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., Defendants. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte under the Court’s inherent power to manage its docket. See Bunn v. Perdue, 966 F.3d 1094, 1099 (10th Cir. 2020) (“District courts are afforded great discretion regarding control of the docket and parties.”) (quoting United States v. Orozco, 916 F.3d 919, 925 (10th Cir. 2019)); SEC v. Mgmt. Sols., Inc., 824 F. App’x 550, 553 (10th Cir. 2020) (‘[A] district court has the inherent power to ‘manage [its] own affairs so as to achieve orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.’”) (quoting Dietz v. Bouldin, 579 U.S. 40, 45 (2016)). Accordingly, the Court will conduct a telephonic status conference, to determine if a second settlement conference is needed, on February 26, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. MST. Counsel shall call 855-244-8681 and enter access code 2314 983 7724 to be connected to the telephonic status conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED. . Zz pews Z Meg DAMIANL.MARTINEZ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dietz v. Bouldin
579 U.S. 40 (Supreme Court, 2016)
United States v. Orozco
916 F.3d 919 (Tenth Circuit, 2019)
Bunn v. Perdue
966 F.3d 1094 (Tenth Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ngo v. Slaughter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ngo-v-slaughter-nmd-2025.