Nga Sze Cheng v. Yuen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nga Sze Cheng v. Yuen

291 A.D.2d 435, 737 N.Y.S.2d 543, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1628

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.D.2d 435 (Nga Sze Cheng v. Yuen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nga Sze Cheng v. Yuen, 291 A.D.2d 435, 737 N.Y.S.2d 543, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In [436]*436an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Priscilla C.Y. Yuen and Kwok Fai Yuen appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Gar-son, J.), dated April 4, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, finding issues of fact as to whether the appellant Kwok Fai Yuen was negligent in the operation of the vehicle owned by the appellant Priscilla C.Y. Yuen (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1111 [b]; § 1180 [a], [e]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Weigand v United Traction Co., 221 NY 39, 42). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, S. Miller, Friedmann and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In [436]*436an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Priscilla C.Y. Yuen and Kwok Fai Yuen appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Gar-son, J.), dated April 4, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, finding issues of fact as to whether the appellant Kwok Fai Yuen was negligent in the operation of the vehicle owned by the appellant Priscilla C.Y. Yuen (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1111 [b]; § 1180 [a], [e]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Weigand v United Traction Co., 221 NY 39, 42). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, S. Miller, Friedmann and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 435, 737 N.Y.S.2d 543, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nga-sze-cheng-v-yuen-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack