Newsome v. Sheppard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Newsome v. Sheppard

91 S.E. 915, 19 Ga. App. 525, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 217

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 20, 1917

Docket7796

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 915 (Newsome v. Sheppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Newsome v. Sheppard, 91 S.E. 915, 19 Ga. App. 525, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 217 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

George, J.

A petition for certiorari, setting out the testimony introduced

in a possessory-warrant ease, and assigning error only in the following sentence: “Bach side closed and the court made a judgment awarding the said corn to the plaintiff, Sheppard, which judgment the defendant assigns as error, ” presents no question for determination by the 'court, and the judge of the superior court properly dismissed the petition for lack of a sufficient assignment. Civil Code of 1910, § 5183; Papworth v. Fitzgerald, 111 Ga. 54 (36 S. E. 311) ; Harrell v. Quitman, 17 Ga. App. 299 (86 S. E. 662), and cases there cited. Nothing in Birdford Supply Co. v. Edwards, 16 Ga. App. 518 (85 S. E. 687); or in Patterson v. Beck, 133 Ga. 701 (66 S. E. 911), conflicts with this ruling.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George, J.

A petition for certiorari, setting out the testimony introduced

in a possessory-warrant ease, and assigning error only in the following sentence: “Bach side closed and the court made a judgment awarding the said corn to the plaintiff, Sheppard, which judgment the defendant assigns as error, ” presents no question for determination by the 'court, and the judge of the superior court properly dismissed the petition for lack of a sufficient assignment. Civil Code of 1910, § 5183; Papworth v. Fitzgerald, 111 Ga. 54 (36 S. E. 311) ; Harrell v. Quitman, 17 Ga. App. 299 (86 S. E. 662), and cases there cited. Nothing in Birdford Supply Co. v. Edwards, 16 Ga. App. 518 (85 S. E. 687); or in Patterson v. Beck, 133 Ga. 701 (66 S. E. 911), conflicts with this ruling.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 915, 19 Ga. App. 525, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newsome-v-sheppard-gactapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack