Newsome v. Sheppard

91 S.E. 915, 19 Ga. App. 525, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 217
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 20, 1917·No. 7796·Published

Opinion

George, J.

A petition for certiorari, setting out the testimony introduced

in a possessory-warrant ease, and assigning error only in the following sentence: “Bach side closed and the court made a judgment awarding the said corn to the plaintiff, Sheppard, which judgment the defendant assigns as error, ” presents no question for determination by the 'court, and the judge of the superior court properly dismissed the petition for lack of a sufficient assignment. Civil Code of 1910, § 5183; Papworth v. Fitzgerald, 111 Ga. 54 (36 S. E. 311) ; Harrell v. Quitman, 17 Ga. App. 299 (86 S. E. 662), and cases there cited. Nothing in Birdford Supply Co. v. Edwards, 16 Ga. App. 518 (85 S. E. 687); or in Patterson v. Beck, 133 Ga. 701 (66 S. E. 911), conflicts with this ruling.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newsome v. Sheppard, 91 S.E. 915, 19 Ga. App. 525, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 217 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

91 S.E. 915 (Newsome v. Sheppard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Papworth v. City of Fitzgerald
36 S.E. 311 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Patterson v. Beck
66 S.E. 911 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Birdford Supply Co. v. Edwards
85 S.E. 687 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Harrell v. City of Quitman
86 S.E. 662 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)