Harrell v. City of Quitman
This text of 86 S.E. 662 (Harrell v. City of Quitman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A petition for certiorari, in which the only attempt to assign error Was in these words: “To which said judgment and sentence your petitioner excepts, and assigns the same as error,” does not comply with section 5183 of the Civil Code, which provides that a plaintiff in certiorari “shall plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of.” Citizens Banking Co. v. Parris, 119 Ga. 517 (46 S. E. 638); Edgeman v. Stewart, 141 Ga. 686 (81 S. E. 1036); Papworth v. Fitzgerald, 111 Ga. 54 (36 S. E. 311); Taft Co. v. Smith, 112 Ga. 196 (37 S. E. 424); Callaway v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 354 (64 S. E. 1105); Birdford Supply Co. v. Edwards, 16 Ga. App. 518 (85 S. E. 687, 688).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 S.E. 662, 17 Ga. App. 299, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-city-of-quitman-gactapp-1915.