Newman v. Hirst

236 So. 3d 506
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2018·No. Case No. 5D17–2482·Published

Opinion

WALLIS, J.

David Newman petitions this court for a writ of certiorari, seeking to quash the trial court's order finding that he expressly waived all privilege objections to the respondents' Boecher 1 interrogatories. We find that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by determining that Newman's agreement to "answer" discovery requests constituted an express waiver of all privileges. See Paradise Divers, Inc. v. Upmal, 943 So.2d 812, 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ; Liberty Mut. Ins. v. Lease Am., Inc., 735 So.2d 560, 561-62 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We grant the petition, quash the order, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newman v. Hirst, 236 So. 3d 506 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

236 So. 3d 506 (Newman v. Hirst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paradise Divers, Inc. v. Upmal
943 So. 2d 812 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boecher
733 So. 2d 993 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. Lease America, Inc.
735 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)