Newman v. Hirst
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DAVID NEWMAN,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D17-2482
GLENN HIRST and WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Respondents.
_________________________________________/
Opinion filed February 16, 2018
Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Keith F. White, Judge.
Christopher V. Carlyle, of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Petitioner.
Brian D. Stokes and Brandon M. Smith, of Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Storey, P.A., Orlando, for Respondents.
WALLIS, J.
David Newman petitions this court for a writ of certiorari, seeking to quash the trial
court's order finding that he expressly waived all privilege objections to the respondents'
Boecher1 interrogatories. We find that the trial court departed from the essential
1 Allstate Ins. v. Boecher, 733 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 1999). requirements of the law by determining that Newman's agreement to "answer" discovery
requests constituted an express waiver of all privileges. See Paradise Divers, Inc. v. Upmal,
943 So. 2d 812, 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Liberty Mut. Ins. v. Lease Am., Inc., 735 So. 2d
560, 561–62 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We grant the petition, quash the order, and remand to
the trial court for further proceedings.
PETITION GRANTED.
PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newman v. Hirst (Newman v. Hirst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.