Newell v. Griswold
6 Johns. 45
This text of 6 Johns. 45 (Newell v. Griswold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Newell v. Griswold, 6 Johns. 45 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).
Opinion
Here was an open, running account, unliquidated between the parties, and no balance struck. There is nothing in the course of dealing between them from which an intent or agreement to allow interest, can be inferred. It is, therefore, not a case of interest. (Camp. N. P. Rep. 50.)
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chase v. Union Stone Co.
11 Daly 107 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1882)
Byrd v. Chase
5 Ark. 602 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1850)
Costigan v. Wood
6 F. Cas. 612 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1838)
President, Directors & Co. of Rensselaer Glass Factory v. Reid
5 Cow. 587 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1825)
Reid v. President & Directors of the Rensselaer Glass Factory
3 Cow. 393 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)
Elliott v. Minott
13 S.C.L. 125 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1822)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Johns. 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/newell-v-griswold-nysupct-1810.