Newell v. Griswold
6 Johns. 45
Opinion
Here was an open, running account, unliquidated between the parties, and no balance struck. There is nothing in the course of dealing between them from which an intent or agreement to allow interest, can be inferred. It is, therefore, not a case of interest. (Camp. N. P. Rep. 50.)
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Newell v. Griswold, 6 Johns. 45 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).
6 Johns. 45 (Newell v. Griswold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chase v. Union Stone Co.
11 Daly 107 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1882)
Byrd v. Chase
5 Ark. 602 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1850)
Costigan v. Wood
6 F. Cas. 612 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1838)
President, Directors & Co. of Rensselaer Glass Factory v. Reid
5 Cow. 587 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1825)
Reid v. President & Directors of the Rensselaer Glass Factory
3 Cow. 393 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)
Elliott v. Minott
13 S.C.L. 125 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1822)