New York State Ophthalmological Society v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of H.H.S

861 F.2d 1283, 274 U.S. App. D.C. 88, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16217
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 1988
Docket87-5057, 87-5065
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 861 F.2d 1283 (New York State Ophthalmological Society v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of H.H.S) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York State Ophthalmological Society v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of H.H.S, 861 F.2d 1283, 274 U.S. App. D.C. 88, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16217 (D.C. Cir. 1988).

Opinions

ON APPELLANTS’ SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, ROBINSON, MIKYA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, [1284]*1284D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellants’ Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. No member of the Court requested the taking of a vote thereon. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

ROBINSON, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, filed the attached statement concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. Sullivan
816 F. Supp. 281 (D. New Jersey, 1992)
American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery v. Bowen
725 F. Supp. 606 (District of Columbia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
861 F.2d 1283, 274 U.S. App. D.C. 88, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-state-ophthalmological-society-v-otis-r-bowen-secretary-of-cadc-1988.