New York State Ophthalmological Society v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of H.H.S

861 F.2d 1283, 274 U.S. App. D.C. 88, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16217
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 2, 1988·No. 87-5057, 87-5065·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

ON APPELLANTS’ SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, ROBINSON, MIKYA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, [1284]*1284D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellants’ Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. No member of the Court requested the taking of a vote thereon. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

ROBINSON, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, filed the attached statement concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York State Ophthalmological Society v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of H.H.S, 861 F.2d 1283, 274 U.S. App. D.C. 88, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 16217 (D.C. Cir. 1988).

861 F.2d 1283 (New York State Ophthalmological Society v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of H.H.S) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stewart v. Sullivan
816 F. Supp. 281 (D. New Jersey, 1992)
American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery v. Bowen
725 F. Supp. 606 (District of Columbia, 1989)