New York State Labor Relations Board v. Wags Transportation System, Inc.
This text of 284 A.D. 883 (New York State Labor Relations Board v. Wags Transportation System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
It is not sufficiently clear that the National Labor Relations Board, in the light of its decisions relating to taxicab companies, would have [884]*884declined jurisdiction in the state of facts disclosed in this case, especially in view of the special terminal contract by which respondent secured exclusive rights in the two great interstate railroad terminals in New York City. There being no clear showing that the National board would not have assumed jurisdiction and also in the absence of a cession agreement under subdivision (a) of section 10 of the Taft-Hartley Act (U. S. Code, tit. 29; § 160, subd. [a]), the appellant could not assert jurisdiction.
The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 883, 134 N.Y.S.2d 603, 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2058, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-state-labor-relations-board-v-wags-transportation-system-inc-nyappdiv-1954.