New York Downtown Hospital v. Terry
This text of 80 A.D.3d 493 (New York Downtown Hospital v. Terry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Amended order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered March 25, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from, conditioned the grant of plaintiffs’ application for a voluntary discontinuance of their action on their payment of the sum of [494]*494$10,000 to defendants, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking the payment requirement, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to plaintiffs’ assertions, it is within a court’s discretion to condition an application for a voluntary discontinuance made pursuant to CPLR 3217 (b) upon the movant paying the adverse party’s legal fees, costs, and disbursements (see Beigel v Cohen, 158 AD2d 339 [1990]). However, under the circumstances presented, the court should have allowed plaintiffs to discontinue their libel claims without any condition (see Townhouse Co., LLC v Peters, 17 Misc 3d 133[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 52111[U] [2007]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Acosta and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 A.D.3d 493, 914 N.Y.S.2d 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-downtown-hospital-v-terry-nyappdiv-2011.