Beigel v. Cohen
158 A.D.2d 339, 551 N.Y.S.2d 28, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1373
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
[340] CPLR 3217 (b) permits the court to grant a motion for voluntary discontinuance "upon terms and conditions, as the court deems proper.” Determination of such a motion is in the court’s sound discretion (Tucker v Tucker, 55 NY2d 378, 383) and it was not an abuse of discretion to condition plaintiffs’ relief on their payment of defendants’ legal fees, costs, and disbursements under the circumstances of this case. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beigel v. Cohen, 158 A.D.2d 339, 551 N.Y.S.2d 28, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
158 A.D.2d 339 (Beigel v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Miller v. 22 Ericsson Owner LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
Maxim Inc. v. Gross
2020 NY Slip Op 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
New York Downtown Hospital v. Terry
80 A.D.3d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Lawrence v. Miller
79 A.D.3d 417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Chris Mac Co. v. Johnson-Ono
186 Misc. 2d 524 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
McCarty v. Alegre-Levine
177 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)