New York City Housing Authority v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
This text of 61 A.D.3d 728 (New York City Housing Authority v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiff and to reimburse the plaintiff for all reasonable attorney’s fees and disbursements incurred in the defense of an underlying action entitled Piliotis v City of New York, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under index No. 20226/03, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated April 17, 2008, which granted the plaintiffs motion to quash a subpoena ad testificandum seeking to compel the deposition of the plaintiffs attorney.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination on a related appeal (see New York City Hous. Auth. v Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 61 AD3d 726 [2009] [decided herewith]). Mastro, J.P., Santucci, Dickerson and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 A.D.3d 728, 876 N.Y.S.2d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-city-housing-authority-v-underwriters-at-lloyds-london-nyappdiv-2009.