New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Doane

4 N.E. 419, 105 Ind. 92, 1886 Ind. LEXIS 419
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 22, 1886
DocketNo. 12,265
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 4 N.E. 419 (New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Doane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Doane, 4 N.E. 419, 105 Ind. 92, 1886 Ind. LEXIS 419 (Ind. 1886).

Opinion

Elliott, J. —

The verdict in this case was returned on the 4th day of July, 1884, and on the following day judgment was entered upon it. On the same day that the judgment was entered the appellant filed a motion for a new trial; the cause was then continued until the 23d day of December, 1884, without any action being taken; on that day the appellee unsuccessfully moved to strike out some of the reasons assigned in the appellant’s motion for a new trial, and on the 23d day of January, 1885, the appellant’s motion was overruled and an appeal prayed.

There was no final judgment within the meaning of the statute governing appeals until the ruling denying the motion for a new trial. The appellant had a right to a ruling on that motion; for it was properly and seasonably filed. Until that [93]*93motion was disposed of, there was no final disposition of the case. It is quite clear that if the appellant had brought up the case before a ruling on the motion, the appeal would have been dismissed, on the ground that it was prematurely taken.

Filed Jan. 22, 1886.

A motion for a new trial is not a collateral one, but is one directly connected with the judgment, and is essential to present for review errors occurring on the trial, and so long as it remains undisposed of there can be no final judgment within the meaning of the statute regulating appeals. A pending motion for a new trial keeps the cause in the trial court, provided, of course, that the motion was seasonably filed.

Motion to dismiss appeal overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. Public Service Commission
54 S.E.2d 169 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1949)
Johnson v. Bouler
186 So. 715 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
Kensinger v. Schaal
161 N.E. 262 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1928)
Kline v. Murray
257 P. 465 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Bryan v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.
231 P. 1091 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1925)
State ex rel. Kensinger v. Cox
141 N.E. 225 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1923)
Thomas v. Thomas
110 N.E. 573 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. Reeves
108 N.E. 275 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Blose v. Myers
107 N.E. 548 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
New Albany Woolen Mills Co. v. Senior
101 N.E. 1025 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1913)
Gearin v. Portland Ry. Light & Power Co.
124 P. 256 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1912)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Johnson
93 N.E. 683 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Blaemire v. Barnes
91 N.E. 232 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Smith v. Biesiada
90 N.E. 1009 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
Kinney v. Heuring
85 N.E. 369 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)
Boonville National Bank v. Blakey
76 N.E. 529 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1906)
Conradt v. Lepper
78 P. 1 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1904)
State ex rel. Payson v. Chapman
76 P. 525 (Washington Supreme Court, 1904)
Logan v. Sult
53 N.E. 456 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1899)
Grussell v. Poll
5 Ohio N.P. 439 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.E. 419, 105 Ind. 92, 1886 Ind. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-york-chicago-st-louis-railroad-v-doane-ind-1886.