Kinney v. Heuring

Indiana Court of Appeals

Kinney v. Heuring

85 N.E. 369, 42 Ind. App. 263, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 36

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 2, 1908

DocketNo. 6,895

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 85 N.E. 369 (Kinney v. Heuring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinney v. Heuring, 85 N.E. 369, 42 Ind. App. 263, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 36 (Ind. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellee movés to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the transcript was not filed within the time fixed by statute. The time for taking appeals under §672 Burns 1908, §633 R. S. 1881, begins to run from the date that the motion for a new trial of the cause is overruled. Joyce v. Dickey (1885), 104 Ind. 183; Moon v. Cline (1895), 11 Ind. App. 460; New York, etc., R. Co. v. Doane (1886), 105 Ind. 92. In the case at bar the motion for a new trial was overruled May 17, 1907, the transcript was filed May 18, 1908. The statute (§1350 Burns 1908, §1280 R. S. 1881) provides that, the time within which an act is to be. done is to be computed'by excluding the first day and including the last day. If the last day be Sunday it should be excluded. The last day in the case at bar occurred on Sunday. The transcript was filed in time.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellee movés to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the transcript was not filed within the time fixed by statute. The time for taking appeals under §672 Burns 1908, §633 R. S. 1881, begins to run from the date that the motion for a new trial of the cause is overruled. Joyce v. Dickey (1885), 104 Ind. 183; Moon v. Cline (1895), 11 Ind. App. 460; New York, etc., R. Co. v. Doane (1886), 105 Ind. 92. In the case at bar the motion for a new trial was overruled May 17, 1907, the transcript was filed May 18, 1908. The statute (§1350 Burns 1908, §1280 R. S. 1881) provides that, the time within which an act is to be. done is to be computed'by excluding the first day and including the last day. If the last day be Sunday it should be excluded. The last day in the case at bar occurred on Sunday. The transcript was filed in time.

Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 N.E. 369, 42 Ind. App. 263, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinney-v-heuring-indctapp-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack