New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission

160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 220
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 4, 1953·No. No. 33434·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence in this case is conflicting. There is substantial evidence in the record to support a finding either in favor of or against the appellant. From an examination of the record, the order of the commission does not appear to be unreasonable or unlawful, and it is, therefore, affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Middleton, Taet, Hart, Zimmerman and Stewart, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission, 160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 220 (Ohio 1953).

160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 220 (New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.