New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission

155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 337

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 1951·No. No. 32362·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Public Utilities Commission was in error in that it failed to comply with the requirements of Section 614-46a, General Code, that “it shall be the duty of the commission to file with the records thereof, written opinions setting forth the reasons prompting the decisions arrived at by the commission, together with a resume from the record of the facts upon which such decisions are based.”

The cause is therefore remanded to the Public Utilities Commission for a full compliance with the above-quoted provisions of the statute.

Cause remanded.

Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Tart, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Public Utilities Commission was in error in that it failed to comply with the requirements of Section 614-46a, General Code, that “it shall be the duty of the commission to file with the records thereof, written opinions setting forth the reasons prompting the decisions arrived at by the commission, together with a resume from the record of the facts upon which such decisions are based.”

The cause is therefore remanded to the Public Utilities Commission for a full compliance with the above-quoted provisions of the statute.

Cause remanded.

Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Tart, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur. Weygandt, C. J., not participating.

New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission, 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 337 (Ohio 1951).

Pincite

155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 337 (New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.