New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mathis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mathis

61 S.E.2d 422, 82 Ga. App. 421, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 1124

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 14, 1950

Docket32994

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 61 S.E.2d 422 (New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Mathis, 61 S.E.2d 422, 82 Ga. App. 421, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 1124 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinions

Worrill, J.

This is an action against the surety on the bond of a county police officer. The facts out of which the action arose, as shown by the petition, were that the plaintiff was driving his automobile in a westwardly direction on a thoroughfare in the City of Decatur when it was struck by an automobile owned by the DeKalb County Police Department and driven by the principal, an officer of such department, while he was responding to an emergency call in regard to another matter not in any way connected with the plaintiff. The petition further alleged that the driver of the vehicle was exceeding the speed limit and ran over a red traffic light, striking the plaintiffs automobile which had entered the intersection on a green light ahead of the police car; and it was alleged that these and certain other acts of the principal constituted [422]*422negligence proximately causing the injuries sued for. The trial court overruled a general demurrer, and the exception here is to that ruling.

Decided September 14, 1950. Rehearing denied October 6, 1950. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, C. Baxter Jones Jr., for plaintiff in error. Fraser & Shelfer, contra.

Held-. Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in Culpepper v. U. S. F. & G. Co., 199 Ga. 56 (33 S. E. 2d, 168), there was no breach of the bond and no liability to the plaintiff on the bond, and the trial court erred in overruling the general demurrer. This case is in no material particular distinguishable from the Culpepper case.

Judgment reversed.

Sutton, C.J., and Felton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worrill, J.

This is an action against the surety on the bond of a county police officer. The facts out of which the action arose, as shown by the petition, were that the plaintiff was driving his automobile in a westwardly direction on a thoroughfare in the City of Decatur when it was struck by an automobile owned by the DeKalb County Police Department and driven by the principal, an officer of such department, while he was responding to an emergency call in regard to another matter not in any way connected with the plaintiff. The petition further alleged that the driver of the vehicle was exceeding the speed limit and ran over a red traffic light, striking the plaintiffs automobile which had entered the intersection on a green light ahead of the police car; and it was alleged that these and certain other acts of the principal constituted [422]*422negligence proximately causing the injuries sued for. The trial court overruled a general demurrer, and the exception here is to that ruling.

Decided September 14, 1950. Rehearing denied October 6, 1950. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, C. Baxter Jones Jr., for plaintiff in error. Fraser & Shelfer, contra.

Held-. Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in Culpepper v. U. S. F. & G. Co., 199 Ga. 56 (33 S. E. 2d, 168), there was no breach of the bond and no liability to the plaintiff on the bond, and the trial court erred in overruling the general demurrer. This case is in no material particular distinguishable from the Culpepper case.

Judgment reversed.

Sutton, C.J., and Felton, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 S.E.2d 422, 82 Ga. App. 421, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-amsterdam-casualty-co-v-mathis-gactapp-1950.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack