Home/Texas Supreme Court/Nevell v. Terrell

Nevell v. Terrell

87 S.W. 669, 99 Tex. 355, 1905 Tex. LEXIS 206
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 27, 1905
DocketNo. 1435.
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 87 S.W. 669 (Nevell v. Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nevell v. Terrell, 87 S.W. 669, 99 Tex. 355, 1905 Tex. LEXIS 206 (Tex. 1905).

Opinions

This is a petition by the relator, Nevell, to compel the Commissioner of the General Land Office to reinstate him upon the records of his office as lessee of the north half of section 37 of block 13 of the G.H. S.A. Ry. Co. surveys. The respondent pleads in abatement of the suit, that after the cancellation of the relator's lease, the land had been leased by him to one, W.H. Nixon, and *Page 356 that this lease is in good standing; and that therefore Nixon is a necessary party to the suit. We think the plea should be sustained and it is accordingly so ordered. The suit will be dismissed unless the relator within fifteen days amend his petition and make Nixon a party defendant to the action.

Filed May 25, 1905.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gallagher v. State
690 S.W.2d 587 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Faulder v. State
612 S.W.2d 512 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Dick v. Kazen
292 S.W.2d 913 (Texas Supreme Court, 1956)
State Ex Rel. Candler v. Court of Civil Appeals
75 S.W.2d 253 (Texas Supreme Court, 1934)
Baten v. Campbell
62 S.W.2d 1010 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Oliver v. Henley
21 S.W.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Cleveland v. Ward
285 S.W. 1063 (Texas Supreme Court, 1926)
Sugarland Industries v. Universal Mills
275 S.W. 406 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Pittman & Harrison Co. v. Shook
228 S.W. 993 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Guinn v. Texas Drug Co.
219 S.W. 507 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Marasso v. Van Pelt
81 So. 529 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Texas Seed & Floral Co. v. Schnoutze
209 S.W. 495 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Ex Parte Meyer
207 S.W. 100 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Porch v. Patterson
156 P. 439 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1916)
State ex rel. West v. Butler
70 Fla. 102 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1915)
Barnes v. State
170 S.W. 548 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Craft v. State
147 S.W. 1163 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
People v. C. Kern Brewing Co.
131 N.W. 557 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Beaumont Traction Company v. Happ
122 S.W. 610 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Ex Parte Massey
92 S.W. 1086 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.W. 669, 99 Tex. 355, 1905 Tex. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nevell-v-terrell-tex-1905.