Neustadt v. Illinois Central Railroad

31 Ill. 484
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 31 Ill. 484 (Neustadt v. Illinois Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neustadt v. Illinois Central Railroad, 31 Ill. 484 (Ill. 1863).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Büeese

delivered tbe opinion of the Court.

The question arising on this record is, have the corporate authorities of the city of La Salle power to levy a tax for municipal purposes upon the property of the Illinois Central Eailroad Company, situated within the limits of that city ?

By the act incorporating the Illinois Central Eailroad Company, approved February 10, 1851, it is provided by section 22, that the lands selected under the act of Congress, and thereby authorized to be conveyed, shall be exempt from all taxation under the laws of this State, until sold and conveyed by said corporation or trustees, and the other stock, property and effects of said company shall be in like manner exempt from taxation for the term of six years from the passage of this act. After the expiration of six years, the stock, property and assets belonging to said company shall be listed by the president, secretary or other officer, with the auditor of State, and an annual tax for State purposes shall be assessed by the auditor upon all the property and assets of every name, kind and description belonging to said corporation. Whenever the taxes levied for State purposes shall exceed three-fourths of one per centum per annum, such excess shall be deducted from the gross proceeds or income herein required to be paid by said corporation to the State, and the said corporation is hereby exempted from all taxation of every kind, except as herein provided for. (Session Laws 1851, page 72.)

The act to incorporate the Illinois Central Eailroad Company, of which the above section is part, is a contract between the State and the company, which cannot be changed or annulled without the consent of both contracting parties.

In consideration of the undertaking of the company to construct a great thoroughfare, which should involve the expenditure of millions, and which was an experiment, and seven per cent, of the gross amount of its receipts or income to be paid to the State, the'company was relieved from the payment of all other than State taxes, to be assessed as provided for in this section. The language is plain .and explicit, “The said corporation is hereby exempted from all taxation of every kind except as herein provided for.”

This being the contract between the State and the corporation, no city or town authority can impose a tax for municipal purposes, on the property of that company which may be within their limits. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. The County of McLean, 17 Ill. 291.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Judgment afirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Illinois Central Railroad
273 Ill. 220 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1916)
State v. Illinois Central Railroad
246 Ill. 188 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1910)
People ex rel. Roche v. Illinois Central Railroad
215 Ill. 177 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1905)
Donahue v. Illinois Central Railroad
46 N.E. 714 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1897)
Winona & St. P. R. v. City of Watertown
44 N.W. 1072 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1890)
Annas v. Milwaukee & Northern Railroad
30 N.W. 282 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1886)
Illinois Central Railroad v. Goodwin
94 Ill. 262 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1880)
Illinois Central Railroad v. Bentley
64 Ill. 438 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ill. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neustadt-v-illinois-central-railroad-ill-1863.