Nettles v. Warden

139 A.2d 242, 215 Md. 659
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 1, 1993
Docket[H.C. No. 93, September Term, 1957.]
StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.2d 242 (Nettles v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nettles v. Warden, 139 A.2d 242, 215 Md. 659 (Md. 1993).

Opinion

215 Md. 659 (1958)
139 A.2d 242

NETTLES
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[H.C. No. 93, September Term, 1957.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 3, 1958.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

HENDERSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioner was denied a writ of habeas corpus by Judge Byrnes, in the Baltimore City Court, and applies for leave to appeal. He was convicted of manslaughter in the Circuit *660 Court for Baltimore County and sentenced to five years. He complains that he was denied "due process" in that he was first held as a witness, and asked the police for a lawyer, before being taken before a magistrate, but the request was denied. In denying the writ, Judge Byrnes stated: "The court records show that at the time of petitioner's trial he was represented by David N. Bates, a competent member of the Baltimore City and Baltimore County Bar". There is no showing of a denial of due process. The petitioner was not entitled to the appointment of counsel at the preliminary hearing.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nettles v. Warden
139 A.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.2d 242, 215 Md. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nettles-v-warden-md-1993.