Nettles v. Warden

139 A.2d 242, 215 Md. 659
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 3, 1958·No. H. C. No. 93·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Henderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioner was denied a writ of habeas corpus by Judge Byrnes, in the Baltimore City Court, and applies for leave to appeal. He was convicted of manslaughter in the Circuit [660] Court for Baltimore County and sentenced to five years. He complains that he was denied “due process” in that he was first held as a witness, and asked the police for a lawyer, before being taken before a magistrate, but the request was denied. In denying the writ, Judge Byrnes stated: “The court records show that at the time of petitioner’s trial he was represented by David N. Bates, a competent member of the Baltimore City and Baltimore County Bar”. There is no showing of a denial of due process. The petitioner was not entitled to the appointment of counsel at the preliminary hearing.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nettles v. Warden, 139 A.2d 242, 215 Md. 659 (Md. 1958).

139 A.2d 242 (Nettles v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nettles v. Warden
139 A.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1993)
White v. State
177 A.2d 877 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1963)