Nestell v. Ryther

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Nestell v. Ryther

660 P.2d 1098, 62 Or. App. 470, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2767

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 6, 1983

Docket16-80-11421; CA A25346

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 660 P.2d 1098 (Nestell v. Ryther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nestell v. Ryther, 660 P.2d 1098, 62 Or. App. 470, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2767 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Based upon a concession made by counsel for plaintiffs-respondents at the time of oral argument, the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiffs in this action for breach of a lease is reduced by $84.98 to the sum of $21,451.96. See Or Const, Art VII (Amended), § 3. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment for plaintiffs modified to sum of $21,451.96, and affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Based upon a concession made by counsel for plaintiffs-respondents at the time of oral argument, the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiffs in this action for breach of a lease is reduced by $84.98 to the sum of $21,451.96. See Or Const, Art VII (Amended), § 3. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment for plaintiffs modified to sum of $21,451.96, and affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

660 P.2d 1098, 62 Or. App. 470, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nestell-v-ryther-orctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack