Nessel v. Lady Hill LLC

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan
DecidedAugust 25, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-10830
StatusUnknown

This text of Nessel v. Lady Hill LLC (Nessel v. Lady Hill LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nessel v. Lady Hill LLC, (E.D. Mich. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, No. 1:23-cv-10830-JEL-PTM Plaintiff, HON. JUDITH E. LEVY v.

LADY HILL, LLC,

Defendant.

CONSENT DECREE AND FINAL JUDGMENT BETWEEN PLAINTIFF DANA NESSEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, AND DEFENDANT LADY HILL, LLC

Plaintiff, Dana Nessel, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, filed a Complaint in this action against Defendant, Lady Hill, LLC (“Defendant”), for permanent injunctive relief to restrain continuing violations of the Michigan Liquor Control Code, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 436.1101, et seq., and the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, Mich. Comp. Laws, §§ 445.901, et seq., by Defendant. The parties have consented to entry of this Consent Decree and Final Judgment (the “Consent Decree”). Now, therefore, without trial of any issue of law or fact, and upon consent of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. The Court has both personal jurisdiction over Defendant and

subject matter jurisdiction over the case pursuant to 27 U.S.C. § 122a(c), 28 U.S.C. § 1331, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k) and 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The Complaint in this case states a claim upon which permanent

injunctive relief can be granted against Defendant under 27 U.S.C. § 122a(c) and a claim upon which permanent injunctive relief and monetary penalties can be granted against Defendant under Mich.

Comp. Laws §§ 445.901, et seq. Venue is proper in this Court. II. PERSONS BOUND 2. The terms and provisions of this Consent Decree will apply

to and be binding upon the Michigan Department of Attorney General, Defendant, and Defendant’s successors in interest, parents, subsidiaries, affiliated entities, directors, officers, managers, agents,

members, assigns, and employees. 3. No change in ownership or corporate status of Defendant, including, but not limited to, any transfer of assets or real or personal property, will in any way alter Defendant’s obligations under this Consent Decree.

III. OBLIGATIONS REGARDING INTOXICATING LIQUOR1

4. Defendant must immediately cease illegally selling and shipping intoxicating liquor to consumers located in the State of Michigan.

5. Defendant must immediately and adequately train and educate its directors, officers, managers, agents, members, assigns, and employees that Defendant is not authorized to sell or ship intoxicating

liquor to consumers located in the State of Michigan. 6. Defendant must make diligent efforts to place adequate disclaimers in all advertisements that Defendant creates or publishes

for the sale of intoxicating liquor that may be viewed within the State of Michigan, including but not limited to internet-based advertisements, to clarify that such offers are not available for acceptance by consumers

located in the State of Michigan.

1 “Intoxicating liquor” is defined as that term is defined in 27 U.S.C. § 122a(a)(2) and includes “alcoholic liquor” as that term is defined in the Michigan Liquor Control Code, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 436.1101, et seq. 7. Defendant must make modifications as are reasonably necessary to ensure that its ordering systems, regardless of format or

mechanism (whether internet-based, telephonic, print, or mail), do not produce the sale or shipment of intoxicating liquor to consumers located

in the State of Michigan. 8. Defendant’s obligations regarding intoxicating liquor in Section III continue until either (1) the law changes to permit

Defendant to sell and ship intoxicating liquor to consumers located in the State of Michigan without a license; or (2) Defendant obtains a license from the Michigan Liquor Control Commission permitting it to

sell and ship intoxicating liquor to consumers located in the State of Michigan. IV. RELEASE AND DISCHARGE

9. Except with respect to the obligations created by or arising out of this Consent Decree, and in consideration of the payment set forth in Section V, the Department of Attorney General releases and

covenants not to sue Defendant for the specific claims alleged against Defendant in the Complaint and specifically reserves the rights set forth in Paragraph 13 herein. 10. In consideration of the Department of Attorney General’s release and covenant not to sue Defendant as set forth in Paragraph 9,

Defendant releases and covenants not to sue the Department of Attorney General for any claims or defenses that may have been raised

by Defendant in this action or in response to this action, including but not limited to any claims that the Department of Attorney General has intentionally interfered with Defendant’s contractual or business

relationships. V. PAYMENT 11. Defendant will pay the total sum of four thousand dollars

($4,000.00) in eight installments of five hundred dollars each by certified check or money order payable to the “State of Michigan Department of Attorney General.” The first installment is due within

14 days of the Effective Date2 of this Consent Decree. Each successive payment is due within 30 days of the due date of the preceding payment. The payments must be sent to:

Department of Attorney General Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Division 2860 Eyde Parkway East Lansing, MI 48823

2 “Effective Date” means the date the Clerk of Court’s office enters this Consent Decree on the docket in this case after signing by the Court. 12. The payment and other consideration in this Consent Decree are in complete settlement of all damages and costs arising out of the

complaint, including all attorney fees. VI. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS

13. Plaintiff expressly reserves the right to seek any and all legal relief available for violations of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 445.901, et seq., and the Michigan Liquor

Control Code, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 436.1101, et seq., that Defendant commits after the Effective Date of this Consent Decree. 14. The Parties expressly understand and acknowledge that this

Consent Decree is not binding on any county prosecutor in the State of Michigan. The Parties expressly understand and acknowledge that this Consent Decree is not binding on the Michigan Department of Treasury

for purposes of any assessments or actions it may take for unpaid taxes, penalties, and interest. Defendant reserves, and does not waive, any rights, claims, or defenses with respect to any such claims or actions.

VII. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 15. The Parties expressly acknowledge and agree that each is responsible for its own attorneys’ fees and costs. VIII. MODIFICATIONS 16. This Consent Decree may be modified by agreement of the

Parties. Modifications must be in writing, signed by counsel for Plaintiff, counsel for Defendant (if represented), and an authorized

representative of Defendant, and must be memorialized in an order executed and entered by the Court. Any such modifications will be effective on the date the Court enters its order approving such

modifications. IX. OTHER CLAIMS 17. Nothing in this Consent Decree constitutes or may be

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal question
28 U.S.C. § 1331
Supplemental jurisdiction
28 U.S.C. § 1367(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nessel v. Lady Hill LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nessel-v-lady-hill-llc-mied-2023.