Nesbitt v. United States
622 F.2d 433
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 26, 1980·No. No. 78-2111·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The reasons for our affirmance were stated quite well in the district court’s opinion which appears in 445 F.Supp. 824 (N.D. Cal. 1978). We adopt Judge Renfrew’s opinion to the extent of Parts I, II, and III.A. As to Part III.B, we merely wish to hold that, to the extent an exception to section 3466 might exist for “perfected and specific liens,” the lien of the appellant was not sufficiently perfected and specific to come within any such exception.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nesbitt v. United States, 622 F.2d 433 (9th Cir. 1980).
622 F.2d 433 (Nesbitt v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Estate of Romani
523 U.S. 517 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Abrams v. Union Bank
9 F.3d 1550 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Durham v. UNITED STATES, BY CIR
545 F. Supp. 1093 (D. New Jersey, 1982)