Nesbitt v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Nesbitt v. United States

622 F.2d 433

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 26, 1980

DocketNo. 78-2111

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 622 F.2d 433 (Nesbitt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nesbitt v. United States, 622 F.2d 433 (9th Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

The reasons for our affirmance were stated quite well in the district court’s opinion which appears in 445 F.Supp. 824 (N.D. Cal. 1978). We adopt Judge Renfrew’s opinion to the extent of Parts I, II, and III.A. As to Part III.B, we merely wish to hold that, to the extent an exception to section 3466 might exist for “perfected and specific liens,” the lien of the appellant was not sufficiently perfected and specific to come within any such exception.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The reasons for our affirmance were stated quite well in the district court’s opinion which appears in 445 F.Supp. 824 (N.D. Cal. 1978). We adopt Judge Renfrew’s opinion to the extent of Parts I, II, and III.A. As to Part III.B, we merely wish to hold that, to the extent an exception to section 3466 might exist for “perfected and specific liens,” the lien of the appellant was not sufficiently perfected and specific to come within any such exception.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 F.2d 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nesbitt-v-united-states-ca9-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack