Nesathurai v. University at Buffalo
This text of 23 A.D.3d 1072 (Nesathurai v. University at Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Sara S. Sperrazza, A.J.), entered August 27, 2004. The order denied plaintiffs motion to dismiss the counterclaim of defendant James Czyrny. '
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and [1073]*1073the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law and in the exercise of discretion without costs, the motion is granted, the counterclaim is dismissed, and that part of the cross motion seeking leave to serve an amended answer to include the proposed amended counterclaim, excepting therefrom subparagraphs (a) and (b) of paragraph 28, is granted upon condition that defendant James Czyrny shall serve an amended answer within 30 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry.
Same memorandum as in Nesathurai v University at Buffalo, State Univ. of N.Y. (23 AD3d 1070 [2005]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.D.3d 1072, 803 N.Y.S.2d 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nesathurai-v-university-at-buffalo-nyappdiv-2005.