Nelson v. State
664 So. 2d 319, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12662, 1995 WL 723557
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nelson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 665 So. 2d 382 →
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s grand theft convictions and the sentences imposed therefor, but reverse and remand the restitution order. Appellant objected to the amount of restitution, and the trial court erroneously failed to allow appellant to be heard on the issue. See Reynolds v. State, 598 So.2d 188, 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Goodson v. State, 400 So.2d 791, 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nelson v. State, 664 So. 2d 319, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12662, 1995 WL 723557 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
664 So. 2d 319 (Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goodson v. State
400 So. 2d 791 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Reynolds v. State
598 So. 2d 188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)