Nelson v. Little

Court of Appeals of Texas

Nelson v. Little

644 S.W.2d 914, 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 3875

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 13, 1983

DocketNo. 2-82-162-CV

StatusPublished

This text of 644 S.W.2d 914 (Nelson v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nelson v. Little, 644 S.W.2d 914, 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 3875 (Tex. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

ASHWORTH, Justice.

Keith Nelson appeals from a judgment refusing to void that portion of his divorce judgment rendered in 1977 which awarded his wife, Carolyn R. Nelson, part of his military retirement benefits when and if the same mature.

We affirm.

Nelson, a career serviceman, was divorced from his wife, Carolyn, on November 9, 1977. The divorce judgment awarded Carolyn 50% of 264/288 months of Nelson’s military retirement benefits when and if received. In 1981 the United States Supreme Court rendered its decision in McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210, 101 S.Ct. 2728, 69 L.Ed.2d 589 (1981), which held that non-disability military retirement is not subject to division under state community property laws. On August 18, 1981, Nelson filed the instant suit for declaratory judgment seek[915]*915ing to void the award of part of the retirement benefits to his wife. Nelson’s sole point of error is that the holding in McCarty v. McCarty, supra, should be applied retroactively. We disagree.

Appellant relies upon Ex parte Buckhanan, 626 S.W.2d 65 (Tex.App.—San Antonio, 1981, no writ) one of the first cases decided in Texas subsequent to McCarty, and which held that McCarty should be applied retroactively. The holding in Buckhanan was short-lived, and in effect has been disapproved at least twice by the same court which originally issued the decision. See Ex parte Rodriguez, 636 S.W.2d 844 (Tex.App.—San Antonio, 1981) writ denied 25 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 170 (Feb. 10, 1982), and Ex parte Hovermale, 636 S.W.2d 828 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1982, no writ). Other cases to the same effect are Ex parte Gaudion, 628 S.W.2d 500 (Tex.App.—Austin, 1982) writ denied 25 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 110 (Dec. 31, 1981); Ex parte Welch, 633 S.W.2d 691 (Tex.App.—Eastland 1982, no writ); and Ex parte Forderhase, 635 S.W.2d 198 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1982, no writ).

The Texas cases cited are in accord with federal law as set forth in Erspan v. Badgett, 659 F.2d 26, cert. denied, 455 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 1443, 71 L.Ed.2d 658 (1982). We also note that since the McCarty decision, the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 96 Stat. 718 (1982), has been enacted, which entitles former spouses to their share of military retirement benefits.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

ASHWORTH, Justice.

Keith Nelson appeals from a judgment refusing to void that portion of his divorce judgment rendered in 1977 which awarded his wife, Carolyn R. Nelson, part of his military retirement benefits when and if the same mature.

We affirm.

Nelson, a career serviceman, was divorced from his wife, Carolyn, on November 9, 1977. The divorce judgment awarded Carolyn 50% of 264/288 months of Nelson’s military retirement benefits when and if received. In 1981 the United States Supreme Court rendered its decision in McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210, 101 S.Ct. 2728, 69 L.Ed.2d 589 (1981), which held that non-disability military retirement is not subject to division under state community property laws. On August 18, 1981, Nelson filed the instant suit for declaratory judgment seek[915]*915ing to void the award of part of the retirement benefits to his wife. Nelson’s sole point of error is that the holding in McCarty v. McCarty, supra, should be applied retroactively. We disagree.

Appellant relies upon Ex parte Buckhanan, 626 S.W.2d 65 (Tex.App.—San Antonio, 1981, no writ) one of the first cases decided in Texas subsequent to McCarty, and which held that McCarty should be applied retroactively. The holding in Buckhanan was short-lived, and in effect has been disapproved at least twice by the same court which originally issued the decision. See Ex parte Rodriguez, 636 S.W.2d 844 (Tex.App.—San Antonio, 1981) writ denied 25 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 170 (Feb. 10, 1982), and Ex parte Hovermale, 636 S.W.2d 828 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1982, no writ). Other cases to the same effect are Ex parte Gaudion, 628 S.W.2d 500 (Tex.App.—Austin, 1982) writ denied 25 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 110 (Dec. 31, 1981); Ex parte Welch, 633 S.W.2d 691 (Tex.App.—Eastland 1982, no writ); and Ex parte Forderhase, 635 S.W.2d 198 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1982, no writ).

The Texas cases cited are in accord with federal law as set forth in Erspan v. Badgett, 659 F.2d 26, cert. denied, 455 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 1443, 71 L.Ed.2d 658 (1982). We also note that since the McCarty decision, the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 96 Stat. 718 (1982), has been enacted, which entitles former spouses to their share of military retirement benefits.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

644 S.W.2d 914, 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 3875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-little-texapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack