Nelson v. California

273 U.S. 641, 47 S. Ct. 106
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 25, 1926
DocketNo. 143
StatusPublished

This text of 273 U.S. 641 (Nelson v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nelson v. California, 273 U.S. 641, 47 S. Ct. 106 (1926).

Opinion

.Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of a Federal question. (1) Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243, 247; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 93.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of Baltimore
32 U.S. 243 (Supreme Court, 1833)
Twining v. New Jersey
211 U.S. 78 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Shulthis v. McDougal
225 U.S. 561 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Hall v. Burr
234 U.S. 712 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Norton v. Whiteside
239 U.S. 144 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 U.S. 641, 47 S. Ct. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-california-scotus-1926.