Nelson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided December 30, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 2010-2339·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEC 30 2010 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Ardell Nelson, Jr., ) Courts for the District of Columbia ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 10 233~J Board of Pardons and Parole et al.,; ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this action brought pro se, plaintiff, a Texas state prisoner, seeks review of a report and

recommendation issued by a magistrate judge in the United States District Court for the Western

District of Texas. Because a federal district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the

decisions of another federal district court, see 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional

provisions); Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied 513

U.S. 1150 (1995), dismissal is required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). A separate Order accompanies

this Memorandum Opinion.

,J Date: December 2'3,2010 United States District Judge

rJ 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nelson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles, (D.D.C. 2010).

Nelson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles (Nelson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleming v. United States
847 F. Supp. 170 (District of Columbia, 1994)