Nelson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
This text of Nelson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles (Nelson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEC 30 2010 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Ardell Nelson, Jr., ) Courts for the District of Columbia ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 10 233~J Board of Pardons and Parole et al.,; ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this action brought pro se, plaintiff, a Texas state prisoner, seeks review of a report and
recommendation issued by a magistrate judge in the United States District Court for the Western
District of Texas. Because a federal district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the
decisions of another federal district court, see 28 U.S.c. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional
provisions); Fleming v. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied 513
U.S. 1150 (1995), dismissal is required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). A separate Order accompanies
this Memorandum Opinion.
,J Date: December 2'3,2010 United States District Judge
rJ 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nelson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nelson-v-board-of-pardons-and-paroles-dcd-2010.