Neinken v. Brill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Neinken v. Brill

254 A.D. 779, 6 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7576

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 779 (Neinken v. Brill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neinken v. Brill, 254 A.D. 779, 6 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover of defendant Brill the possession or the value of certain bonds admittedly stolen from plaintiff, of which that defendant [780]*780claimed to be a holder in due course and without notice of defect in title, the verdict was for plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Neinhen v. Brill, 251 App. Div. 730.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover of defendant Brill the possession or the value of certain bonds admittedly stolen from plaintiff, of which that defendant [780]*780claimed to be a holder in due course and without notice of defect in title, the verdict was for plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Neinhen v. Brill, 251 App. Div. 730.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 779, 6 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neinken-v-brill-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack