Neinken v. Brill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Neinken v. Brill

254 A.D. 779, 6 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7576

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 1938·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover of defendant Brill the possession or the value of certain bonds admittedly stolen from plaintiff, of which that defendant [780] claimed to be a holder in due course and without notice of defect in title, the verdict was for plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Neinhen v. Brill, 251 App. Div. 730.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover of defendant Brill the possession or the value of certain bonds admittedly stolen from plaintiff, of which that defendant [780] claimed to be a holder in due course and without notice of defect in title, the verdict was for plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Neinhen v. Brill, 251 App. Div. 730.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Neinken v. Brill, 254 A.D. 779, 6 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 779 (Neinken v. Brill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.