Neeta Webb v. Robert E. Nolan, M.D.

Fourth Circuit

Neeta Webb v. Robert E. Nolan, M.D.

484 F.2d 1049, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7853

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 18, 1973

Docket72-2250

StatusPublished

Cited by32 cases

This text of 484 F.2d 1049 (Neeta Webb v. Robert E. Nolan, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neeta Webb v. Robert E. Nolan, M.D., 484 F.2d 1049, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7853 (4th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Neeta Webb, pleading she was a resident and citizen of California, sought damages in the District Court from Robert E. Nolan, a resident and citizen of North Carolina, for alleged medical malpractice, laying jurisdiction of the action on diversity of citizenship. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court, August 28, 1972, sustained the defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding the evidence insufficient to establish the plain[1050]*1050tiff’s citizenship elsewhere than in North Carolina when the action was commenced. Plaintiff appeals.

Upon consideration of the briefs, oral argument and the record, this court concludes that the finding of the District Court cannot be held clearly erroneous.

The judgment on appeal is affirmed upon the opinion of the District Judge. Webb v. Nolan, 361 F.Supp. 418 (MDNC 1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Neeta Webb, pleading she was a resident and citizen of California, sought damages in the District Court from Robert E. Nolan, a resident and citizen of North Carolina, for alleged medical malpractice, laying jurisdiction of the action on diversity of citizenship. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court, August 28, 1972, sustained the defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding the evidence insufficient to establish the plain[1050]*1050tiff’s citizenship elsewhere than in North Carolina when the action was commenced. Plaintiff appeals.

Upon consideration of the briefs, oral argument and the record, this court concludes that the finding of the District Court cannot be held clearly erroneous.

The judgment on appeal is affirmed upon the opinion of the District Judge. Webb v. Nolan, 361 F.Supp. 418 (MDNC 1972).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

484 F.2d 1049, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neeta-webb-v-robert-e-nolan-md-ca4-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack