Neering v. State

155 So. 2d 874
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 7, 1963·No. Nos. 31865, 31909, 31959·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The writs of certiorari having been improvidently issued, they should be and are

Discharged.

THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, C. J., .and TERRELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neering v. State, 155 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1963).

155 So. 2d 874 (Neering v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.
606 So. 2d 227 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Sandstrom v. State
336 So. 2d 572 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Bumgarner v. State
245 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Muir v. Muir
232 So. 2d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
196 So. 2d 124 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Neering v. State
164 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Rogers v. King
161 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)