Neering v. State

155 So. 2d 874
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 1963
DocketNos. 31865, 31909, 31959
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 155 So. 2d 874 (Neering v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neering v. State, 155 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1963).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The writs of certiorari having been improvidently issued, they should be and are

Discharged.

THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, C. J., .and TERRELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.
606 So. 2d 227 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Sandstrom v. State
336 So. 2d 572 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Bumgarner v. State
245 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Muir v. Muir
232 So. 2d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
196 So. 2d 124 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Neering v. State
164 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Rogers v. King
161 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 So. 2d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neering-v-state-fla-1963.