Neely v. Henkel

180 U.S. 126
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 14, 1901·No. No. 2; No. 406·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this case, it is admitted, shows the same state of facts as in the case just decided. .This was a second application. for a writ of habeas corpus, upon substantially the same grounds as were urged in the other case. The additional allegations in this application for the writ did not materially change the situation.

Eor the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered, the judgment of the Circuit Court is-

Affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neely v. Henkel, 180 U.S. 126 (1901).

180 U.S. 126 (Neely v. Henkel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Galanis
429 F. Supp. 1215 (D. Connecticut, 1977)