Neely v. Henkel

Supreme Court

Neely v. Henkel

180 U.S. 126

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 14, 1901

DocketNo. 2; No. 406

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 U.S. 126 (Neely v. Henkel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neely v. Henkel, 180 U.S. 126 (1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this case, it is admitted, shows the same state of facts as in the case just decided. .This was a second application. for a writ of habeas corpus, upon substantially the same grounds as were urged in the other case. The additional allegations in this application for the writ did not materially change the situation.

Eor the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered, the judgment of the Circuit Court is-

Affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this case, it is admitted, shows the same state of facts as in the case just decided. .This was a second application. for a writ of habeas corpus, upon substantially the same grounds as were urged in the other case. The additional allegations in this application for the writ did not materially change the situation.

Eor the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered, the judgment of the Circuit Court is-

Affirmed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 U.S. 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neely-v-henkel-scotus-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack