Neeley v. State
This text of 22 S.W.2d 138 (Neeley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense is transporting intoxicating liquor; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for four years.
It appears from the record that appellant entered into recognizance on appeal. The recognizance is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court. The form of recognizance on appeal is set out in Article 817, C. C. P. This article requires that the appellant bind himself to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas. The recognizance disclosed by the record does riot bind appellant to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Thompson v. State, 243 S. W. 848.
Appeal dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 S.W.2d 138, 113 Tex. Crim. 401, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neeley-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.