Neeley v. CW Roberts Contracting, Inc.

948 So. 2d 844, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2007 WL 216432
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 2007·No. No. 1D06-6675·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court denying his motions to compel discovery. As we have repeatedly observed, orders having the effect of denying discovery are almost invariably not reviewable by certiorari because of the absence of irreparable harm. See Boyd v. Pheo, Inc., 664 So.2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Esman v. Bd. of Regents, 425 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Inasmuch as any error by the circuit court will be readily remediable on appeal, this case presents no basis for departing from this general rule. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neeley v. CW Roberts Contracting, Inc., 948 So. 2d 844, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2007 WL 216432 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

948 So. 2d 844 (Neeley v. CW Roberts Contracting, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AMERICAN PRIME TITLE SERVICES, LLC v. ZHI WANG
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
State v. Foley
193 So. 3d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Damsky & Damsky v. University of Miami and Livingstone, M.D.
152 So. 3d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Bill Kasper Construction Co. v. Morrison
93 So. 3d 1061 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)