Neeley v. CW Roberts Contracting, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Neeley v. CW Roberts Contracting, Inc.

948 So. 2d 844, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2007 WL 216432

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 2007

DocketNo. 1D06-6675

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 948 So. 2d 844 (Neeley v. CW Roberts Contracting, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neeley v. CW Roberts Contracting, Inc., 948 So. 2d 844, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2007 WL 216432 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court denying his motions to compel discovery. As we have repeatedly observed, orders having the effect of denying discovery are almost invariably not reviewable by certiorari because of the absence of irreparable harm. See Boyd v. Pheo, Inc., 664 So.2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Esman v. Bd. of Regents, 425 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Inasmuch as any error by the circuit court will be readily remediable on appeal, this case presents no basis for departing from this general rule. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court denying his motions to compel discovery. As we have repeatedly observed, orders having the effect of denying discovery are almost invariably not reviewable by certiorari because of the absence of irreparable harm. See Boyd v. Pheo, Inc., 664 So.2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Esman v. Bd. of Regents, 425 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Inasmuch as any error by the circuit court will be readily remediable on appeal, this case presents no basis for departing from this general rule. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

948 So. 2d 844, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2007 WL 216432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neeley-v-cw-roberts-contracting-inc-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack