Neches River Conservation District v. Seeman

252 F.2d 327
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 1958
DocketNo. 16661
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 252 F.2d 327 (Neches River Conservation District v. Seeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neches River Conservation District v. Seeman, 252 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1958).

Opinion

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing a suit by the appellant seeking to enjoin the building of a dam and reservoir on the Angelina River in Texas, and is a companion case with Anderson v. Seeman, 5 Cir., 252 F.2d 321.

The appellant, plaintiff below, not attacking the constitutionality of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945, 50 Stat. 10, as it related to this particular dam, charges only that that Act, correctly construed, forbids the United States Government to build the dam without first obtaining permission from the Texas Board of Water Engineers.

We have dealt fully with this contention also made by the individual landowners who were the plaintiffs in the companion suit. Having determined that issue against the contention of the appellant here, we need not consider the other interesting and somewhat troublesome grounds for affirming the judgment of the trial court urged upon us by the Government, i.e. (1) The plaintiff has failed to allege such injury as would entitle it to an injunction, and (2) The complaint fails to show any right in plaintiff to assert on behalf of the State of Texas any claim that the rights of the State will be invaded by the proposed construction.

Deciding, as we do, that the law authorizing the construction of this dam cannot be construed as requiring the permission of the State before it is built, we must agree with the trial court that the complaint fails to assert a claim on which relief could be granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1984
Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1984
Neches River Conservation District v. Seeman
252 F.2d 327 (Fifth Circuit, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 F.2d 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neches-river-conservation-district-v-seeman-ca5-1958.