Nebraska v. Wyoming (Colorado, Impleaded Defendant, and the United States, Intervenor)

345 U.S. 981, 73 S. Ct. 1041, 97 L. Ed. 1394, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1909
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 15, 1953
Docket5, Original
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 345 U.S. 981 (Nebraska v. Wyoming (Colorado, Impleaded Defendant, and the United States, Intervenor)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nebraska v. Wyoming (Colorado, Impleaded Defendant, and the United States, Intervenor), 345 U.S. 981, 73 S. Ct. 1041, 97 L. Ed. 1394, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1909 (1953).

Opinion

The joint motion for approval of a stipulation and to modify and supplement the decree is granted and the following order is entered in compliance with the stipulation:

The parties to this cause having filed a stipulation, dated January 14, 1953, and a joint motion for approval of the stipulation and to modify and supplement the decree entered on October 8, 1945 (325 U. S. 665) and the Court being fully advised:

The stipulation dated January 14, 1953, is approved; and

It is Ordered that the decree of October 8, 1945, is hereby modified and supplemented as follows:

1. In paragraph I (a) of the decree the figure “145,000” is substituted for the figure “135,000.”

2. Paragraph XIII is amended by striking the first sentence and substituting for it the following:

Any of the parties may apply at the foot of this decree for its amendment or for further relief, except that for a period of five years from and after June 15, 1953, the State of Colorado shall not institute any proceedings for the amendment of the decree or for further relief. In the event that within said period of five years any other party applies for an amendment of the decree or for further relief, then the State of Colorado may assert any and all rights, claims or defenses available to it under the decree as amended.

3. Two new paragraphs, as follows, are added to the decree:

XYI. Whatever claims or defenses the parties or any of them may have in respect to the application, *982 interpretation or construction of the Act of August 9, 1937 (50 Stat. 564-595) shall be determined without prejudice to any party arising because of any development of the Kendrick Project occurring subsequent to October 1, 1951.
XVII. When Glendo Dam and Reservoir are constructed, the following provisions shall be effective:
(a) The construction and operation of the Glendo Project shall not impose any demand on areas at or above Seminoe Reservoir which will prejudice any rights that the States of Colorado or Wyoming might have to secure a modification of the decree permitting an expansion of water uses in the natural basin of the North Platte River in Colorado or above Seminoe Reservoir in Wyoming.
(b) The construction and operation of Glendo Reservoir shall not affect the regimen of the natural flow of the North Platte River above Pathfinder Dam. The regimen of the natural flow of the North Platte River below Pathfinder Dam shall not be changed, except that not more than 40,000 acre feet of the natural flow of the North Platte River and its tributaries which cannot be stored in upstream reservoirs under the provisions of this decree may be stored in the Glendo Reservoir during any water year, in addition to evaporation losses on such storage, and, further, the amount of such storage water that may be held in storage at any one time, including carryover storage, shall never exceed 100,000 acre feet. Such storage water shall be disposed of in accordance with contracts to be hereafter executed, and it may be used for the irrigation of lands in the basin of the North Platte River in western Nebraska to the extent *983 of 25,000 acre feet annually, and for the irrigation of lands in the basin of the North Platte River in southeastern Wyoming below Guernsey Reservoir to the extent of 15,000 acre feet annually, provided that it shall not be used as a substitute for storage water contracted for under any existing permanent arrangements. The above limitation on storage of natural flow does not apply to flood water which may be temporarily stored in any capacity allocated for flood control in the Glendo Reservoir, nor to water originally stored in Pathfinder Reservoir which may be temporarily re-stored in Glendo Reservoir after its release from Pathfinder and before its delivery pursuant to contract; nor to water which may be impounded behind Glendo Dam, as provided in the Bureau of Reclamation Definite Plan Report for the Glendo Unit dated December 1952, for the purpose of creating a head for the development of water power.
(c) Paragraph III of the decree is amended to read as follows:
III. The State of Wyoming, its officers, attorneys, agents and employees, be and they are hereby severally enjoined from storing or permitting the storage of water in Pathfinder, Guernsey, Seminoe, Alcova and Glendo Reservoirs otherwise than in accordance with the relative storage rights, as among themselves, of such reservoirs, which are hereby defined and fixed as follows:
First, Pathfinder Reservoir;
Second, Guernsey Reservoir;
Third, Seminoe Reservoir;
Fourth, Alcova Reservoir; and
Fifth, Glendo Reservoir;
*984 Provided, however that water may be impounded in or released from Seminoe Reservoir, contrary to the foregoing rule of priority operation for use in the generation of electric power when and only when such storage or release will not materially interfere with the administration of water for irrigation purposes according to the priority decreed for the French Canal and the State Line Canals.
Storage rights of Glendo Reservoir shall be subject to the provisions of this paragraph III.
(d) Paragraph IV of the decree is amended to read as follows:
IV. The State of Wyoming, its officers, attorneys, agents and employees be and they are hereby severally enjoined from storing or permitting the storage of water in Pathfinder, Guernsey, Seminoe, Alcova and Glendo Reservoirs, and from the diversion of natural flow water through the Casper Canal for the Kendrick Project between and including May 1 and September 30 of each year otherwise than in accordance with the rule of priority in relation to the appropriations of the Nebraska lands supplied by the French Canal and by the State Line Canals, which said Nebraska appropriations are hereby adjudged to be senior to said five reservoirs and said Casper Canal, and which said Nebraska appropriations are hereby identified and defined, and their diversion limitations in second feet and seasonal limitations in acre feet fixed as follows:
Lands
Canal
Limitation in Sec. Feet
Seasonal Limitation in Acre Ft.
Tract of 1025 acres French 15 2,227
Mitchell 195 35,000 Mitchell Irrigation District
Gering 193 36,000 Gering Irrigation District
Tri-State 748 183,050 Farmers Irrigation District
Ramshorn 14 3,000 Ramshorn Irrigation District
*985 (e) Paragraph V of the decree is amended to read as follows:
V.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nebraska v. Wyoming
515 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1995)
Nebraska v. Rural Electrification Administration
23 F.3d 1336 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
Hartwig v. United States
485 F.2d 615 (Court of Claims, 1973)
Jenkins Truck Line, Inc. v. United States
318 F. Supp. 207 (S.D. Iowa, 1970)
Beeline Express, Inc. v. United States
308 F. Supp. 721 (D. Colorado, 1970)
Dixie Ohio Express, Inc. v. United States
263 F. Supp. 993 (N.D. Ohio, 1966)
T. I. McCormack Trucking Co. v. United States
251 F. Supp. 526 (D. New Jersey, 1966)
DeCamp Bus Lines v. United States
224 F. Supp. 196 (D. New Jersey, 1963)
Ballentine Produce, Inc. v. United States
209 F. Supp. 679 (W.D. Arkansas, 1962)
State v. Redman Petroleum Corp.
360 P.2d 842 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1961)
Floyd & Beasley Transfer Company v. United States
185 F. Supp. 390 (N.D. Alabama, 1960)
Ace Lines, Inc. v. United States
197 F. Supp. 591 (S.D. Iowa, 1960)
Burlington-Chicago Cartage, Inc. v. United States
178 F. Supp. 857 (S.D. Illinois, 1959)
People v. Talley
172 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 797 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 U.S. 981, 73 S. Ct. 1041, 97 L. Ed. 1394, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nebraska-v-wyoming-colorado-impleaded-defendant-and-the-united-states-scotus-1953.